Defining
Terms Per MW Online Dictionary
-
A Lie:something that misleads or deceives
-
To cheat: to
deprive of something valuable by the use of
deceit or fraud
-
A Promise:a
legally binding declaration that gives the
person to whom it is made a right to expect or
to claim the performance or forbearance of a
specified act
-
To Steal: to take
the property of another wrongfully and
especially as an habitual or regular practice
Further Terms
White Lie:
Thiroux quotes Bok when defining white lie: “A
falsehood not meant to injure anyone, and of
little moral impact.”
Thiroux suggests white lies have little moral
impact. They are ways of functioning
in a day-to-day world.
Other ethicists would disagree
and discourage lying. They say you are known for your words and
actions. If one continually engages himself in a
web of white lies, eventually you lose people's
trust and respect. People will not believe
you. Your self-respect and self-integrity, and
self-dignity will gradually be eroded.
Thomas Sowell
comments in his March 30, 2005 editorial, "This
must be the golden age of euphemisms. When
people deliberately violate our laws by crossing
our borders illegally, they are called
'undocumented workers.' When people steal
copyrighted material and exchange it among
themselves. that is 'file swapping' instead of
fencing stolen goods" ("Why are pedophiles ever
freed from jail? Norwich Bulletin, page A5).
Lies of Commission & Omission
Thiroux
distinguishes between lies of commission & lies
of omission.
A lie of commission is actually telling someone
a lie.
A lie
of omission is refraining from giving
information to give someone the wrong
impression. For example, you may not volunteer
the information that you take drugs or have
committed a serious crime, and give people the
opposite impression
=============================================================================
Ethical Theories & their views on lying,
cheating, breaking promises: & cheating:
|
Lying, Cheating, Breaking
Promises, Stealing |
|
Reasons against
doing these acts |
Reasons supporting these acts |
-
It
diminishes the one committing the
act
-
Loss of
personal integrity & self-respect
-
It is
bad for one’s reputation
-
It
is dishonest
-
It's
not kind
-
It is
unfair to others
-
It
shows a lack of respect for the
other
-
It
dehumanizes the other by using him
-
Diminishes
personal relationships
-
It
diminishes the trust people have in
you
-
It does
not promote good human(family
friend, community ) relationships
-
It’s
hard to run a society with these
injustices
-
May
lead you in prison
-
The
domino effect - one thing leads to
another
-
It
violates the Divine Command and
golden rule
-
It
makes life harder for you in the
long run
-
Being
mislead eventually angers others
-
It is a
violation of others' rights
-
Negative overall effect on society
|
-
Self-defense
-
Defense of others
-
Defense of our country
-
Exceptional circumstances
-
Everybody
does this
-
It
evens out the scores
-
It
makes up for past wrongs
-
The
game is winning
-
It's
the result that counts
-
It’s
the way of the world. Be realistic
-
It
may not be a big deal
-
It’s
expedient
-
To
yield a greater good or pleasure
-
Promotes a fair, chaos-free society
-
Better
solution for some moral
conflicts
-
It may seem to be the "kinder" act
which preserves and nurtures
relationships
-
Duress, pain,torture
-
It's the way the world functions
|
Case Study - Journalists
lie under duress to secure their release:
The Associated Press
reported on August 28,2006 that just prior to the
release of two Fox News journalist captives
(Olaf Wlig, 36, from New Zealand; and Steve
Centanni, 60, from America) they "appeared
in a video dressed in traditional Arab
robes, ranting against the West and saying
they had converted to Islam." (Article Title
"Captured journalists freed, Page A3,
Norwich Bulletin, August 28, 2006)
Needless to say, the
journalists who were freed on 8/17/06 said
these statement under duress after having
been in captivity for two week. Their
possessions had been taken away and they
were abused. .
Why did they lie? Steve
Centanni told Fox, "It was something we felt
we had to do because they had the guns, and
we didn't know what the hell was going on."
As true journalists, their
fear is that reporters may be frightened by
the prospect of reporting in Gaza.
Question for discussion:
- Is telling the
truth an absolute value that one
should never deviate from?
- When is it OK to
lie? What justifies a lie?
- When is it not OK
to lie?
- Were the two
journalists, Wlig and Centanni
justified in lying?
- On the hierarchy
of values, where does lying fit in
compared to other values?
Case Study # 2
Fifteen sailors were seized by
Iran in the Gulf on March 23,2007. They were in
disputed waters of the Persian Gulf . They said
they had crossed the line.
Video Case Studies we've
seen in class
There are classic examples of
individuals who say they would never lie or
offer a false confession (confess to committing
a crime they did not do).
23% of individuals freed from
jail because of DNA evidence had confessed to
committing a crime. (20/20 video)
7 out of 8 students
confessed to touching a key which broke a
computer system in experiments.
The Milgram experiment showed
how individuals were willing to relinquish their
common sense because an authority figure took
responsibility for their actions
I hope video case studies we
have discussed in class prevent you from
offering a false confession & make you more
aware of our susceptibility when
confronted with an authority figure and a
corroborating witness in a hot stuffy room.
I also hope viewing the relinquishing of
responsibility to another has provided you with
ethical insights and knowledge to avoid such
actions.
For centuries people have been
saying, "I'll never do that, say that, or deny
you." The classic example is Peter in the
Bible who tells Christ , "I will never deny
You." But the does before the cock crows
three times. Knowledge garnered from case
studies, and ethical instruction provides us
with wisdom to avoid ethical lapses.
Former hyperlinked learning objectives
-
Students will critically think about lying,
cheating, breaking promises and stealing
-
Students will take an
ethical inventory to realize how ethical
they are
Student volunteers will take a voluntary, anonymous
general survey
which I will tabulate to see the class
opinion vs. personal opinion.
- Students
will be able to define
-
lying
-
white
lie
-
lies of
commission
-
lies of
omission
-
cheating
-
promise
-
stealing
- Students
will understand differing ethical
perspectives on lying
- Students
will be familiar with arguments for and
against lying, cheating, breaking promises &
stealing
-
Students will have the ability to apply
theoretical and philosophical statements on
lying to real life case studies situations
==========================================================
Hayes
reports the following : (January 2005)
-
A Chicago newspaper survey showed 7/10
employees steal at least some small item
from their employers, “Fringe Benefit.”
-
People today no longer lie, they merely
“juggle the facts” or “stretch the
truth”.
-
People no longer steal; they “Rip off”,
“Lift”, or “Borrow”.
-
People no longer cheat; they “Pad
expenses”, or “Fudge the figures.”
-
Another university study revealed by age
10 the average child develops “A
non-condemning attitude toward
cheating.”
=========================================================
STATISTICS
A 20/20
Article that is no longer on the web
(20/20 article
below
http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/Primetime/US/cheating_040429-2.html)
states the following:
1. CHEATING
In decade from 1992
to 2002 the number of high school students who
admit that they cheated on an exam in the past
year increased significantly from 61% to 74%. In
2000, 71% admitted to cheating.
-
Students
participating in varsity sports were more
likely to cheat than non-participants (78%
vs. 73%).
-
Students
attending religious schools were more likely
to cheat than students at other schools (78%
vs. 72%).
-
Gender, student
leadership, and personal religious
convictions had no material impact.
-
The number of
students who admit they cheated two or more
times in the past year has increased only
slightly from 1992 to 2002 (1992 – 46%; 2000
– 44%; 2002 – 48%).
==========================================================
Figures
Authoritative numbers are hard to come by, but
according to a 2002 confidential survey of
12,000 high school students, 74 percent admitted
cheating on an examination at least once in the
past year. From
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132376&page=1
Retrieved 3/15/05
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article
Title: A Cheating Crisis in America's Schools
from
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132376&page=2
retrieved March 15, 2005
Reasons for cheating: Grading Curve
"Even
if the world were more ethical, students still
have reasons for cheating. Some said they cheat
because they're graded on a curve — so that
their score is directly affected by how other
students do.
"There's other people getting better grades than
me and they're cheating. Why am I not going to
cheat? It's kind of almost stupid if you don't,"
said Joe. "
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132376&page=2
"McCabe
says, a survey of more than 4,000 U.S. and
Canadian schools revealed half of all faculty
members admitted ignoring cheating at least
once. http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132376&page=3
Article Title: Big Cheats on Campus: Cheating
Has Never Been Easier -- Especially for the
Wealthiest Students from
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=264646&page=1
retrieveed 3/15/05
Martinez needed
money, so she wrote papers for her wealthy
roommate:
"Elena Martinez says she was paid about $20,000
to do another student's schoolwork". (ABCNEWS.com)
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=264646&page=1
"Martinez says that over three-and-a half-years
she earned about $20,000 doing Laurie's
assignments. At least one of her teachers
appeared to notice that Laurie's homework was
better than her in-class work.http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=264646&page=2
Students not only use technology to cheat,
but traditional devices too:
"Some
write on a rubber band, which become legible
when they stretch it. Others put test answers on
water bottle labels. (The water magnifies the
tiny print.)
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=264646&page=1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Custom Paper -
is this cheating? Is it different from going to
a tutoring center or asking peers for review?
"Buying
a "custom" paper is a way students get around
programs like Turnitin. On the Internet there
are hundreds of places, like SchoolSucks.com,
that offer term papers written by others, for a
price — maybe $15 per page — written just for
you. "
"Anna
Popielarz owns a paper mill Web site called
CustomPapers.com. She says the papers she sells
will not be caught by plagiarism software. Like
the students who cheat, Popielarz doesn't show
any shame. "
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=264646&page=2
Is taking
medication cheating?
Title
of Article: Students Take ADHD Drug to
Boost Scores: Doctors Say Adderall Abuse Gives
Unfair Advantage and May Endanger Health from
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/News/story?id=254123&page=1
,
retrieved 3/15/05 - published 11/15/04
"Kevin
Ngo, a Baylor University graduate now studying
for the law school entrance exam, isn't leaving
anything to chance. He is seeking help from a
pill that's meant to treat attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder.
"There
is something about Adderall that makes you
concentrate, focus and makes whatever you're
studying more interesting," he said.
More
than 6.4 million prescriptions for Adderall were
filled last year. Some of these prescriptions
are being used by students seeking a quick fix
for studying. "
"A Yale
University junior said Adderall helped him read
the 576-page novel "Crime and Punishment" and
write a 15-page paper — all in 30 hours. "
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/News/story?id=254123&page=1
===========================================================
Hacking
Harvard reported
in March 2005 that some individuals had hacked
into their filed and peeked at who was accept
to their university. Is there
something wrong with this? No rules were posted
against hacking. Should these students be
dismissed?
"Harvard Business School will reject 119
applicants who followed a hacker's instructions
and peeked into the school's admission site to
see if they had been accepted, the school's dean
said."
Associated press march 2005, page C6 Norwich
Bulletin)
========================================================
Former
hostage, journalist Jill Carroll lied when she
was in captivity for three months. She said what
needed to be said to be set free.
=====================================
False
confessions
20/20
reports that there are many false confessions
(Inside the Box)
Of prisoners released because of DNA proof
of innocence, 23% had signed guilty confessions.