| . |
Lesson Objectives:
- To know the definition of proportionalists
- To understand why proportionalism is advocated
- To understand criticism of proportionalism
Definition:
Proportionalism (or consequentialism in its extreme form): An
ethical system wherein one weighs good and bad effects in order to
determine the proper action.
Support for Proportionalism:
Supporters of proportionalism contend that absolutist rules are
illogical and irrelevant to today's complicated life. They further
claim that no action is good or bad in its own right, but must be judged
in context with the effect. For example, being generous and giving
money is not intrinsically good or bad. Rather, one must weigh to
whom money is being given - to a poor mother who needs it to support her
child, or to a drug addict who wants it to purchase illegal drugs.
Proportionalists claim all must be weighed in its own terms.
Criticism of proportionalism:
- Nothing is evil in itself. We have to wait until we see the
consequences.
- Proportionalism implies that what is good is not really good, but
merely better.
- Denies that each moral action humanizes and each immoral action
dehumanizes, independent of consequences. This denies that
we are what we do (evil or good). Thus proportionalism
claims we can separate ourselves from our actions - that our body and
spirit can be separated.
- It may encourage one to do a small evil to produce a greater good
(i.e., steal to help finances, lie to save face or prevent conflict)
- Proportionalism implies we are able to weigh incommensurable
goods and foresee all consequences. Is life more complex than
Dear Abby?
- Proportionalism is very subjective. Moral visions vary
and shouldn't our moral vision grow daily?
|