Walkup's Way Home Moral Theories - General Introduction

"There is one thing a professor can be absolutely certain of; almost every student entering  the university believes, or says he believes, that truth is relative."
 Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind
                    

Links to lectures I've prepared on moral theories

* Moral Theories

  1. Duty-Defined nonconsequentialist  
  2. Consequentialist (Teleological) Theories of Morality
  3. Virtue Ethics (also called Character Ethics)
  4. Feminist Ethics
  5. Biomedical Ethics

 Critique of Moral   Theories

Divine Command
Egoism
Intuitionism
Kantian Ethics
Relativism vs. Absolutism
Utilitarianism


 

 

  Learning Outcomes:
  • Student will be able to define values and list values
  • Student will know and understand the three general ethical  categories for studying ethics that will be discussed throughout the semester

People generally hold  many values in common, yet respond differently to  Case Study Discussion Question

Definition
By values
I mean  " principles or qualities that one considers important, right, or good" (Carter).  Examples would be honesty,  compassion, cooperation, courage, diversity, equality, fairness, family, faithfulness, fidelity, generosity, God, good faith, health,  honesty, justice, integrity, fairness, honesty, kazein, kindness, loyalty,  music, patriotism, quality time, religion, respect, spiritual life, tolerance, trustworthiness, etc.

For purposes of the introductory portion of this course,  people/ethics will be divided  in three categories which directly relate to the action they will take.

  1.  Duty-Defined      (Absolute)
  2.  Consequential      (Relative)
  3.  Virtue Ethics        (Character)

Philosophical/ethical stand generally determines actions.  As Macelli states, "Ideas have consequences." Therefore, it is of utmost importance that we be properly informed.

Discussion Question:
Let's say a benefactor of Three Rivers is offering free tuition for next semester to all students who score a 90 or above in their math class.  Julie could fall in the scholarship category if  she cheated on her take-home final.  What might she decide to do based on her moral orientation

1. Duty-Defined   individuals would probably say, "It's my duty to be honest,  not to cheat and not to lie.   It's a universally rational law that a world could not exist well if people cheated.  There's no question as to what I should do. The Ten Commandments say so."

2. Consequentialists would say, "It's more complicated than that. What would be the results of my cheating?  Would it help my financial situation, so that I could spare the family financial hardships? I may be laid off because of cutbacks. My kids  should get their persistent colds checked out. The benefactor has money to spare.  I'd be benefiting 5 people and the family would be happy....   Yes, the end result would be better if I got a scholarship. A greater good would be produced by my taking the money....   would it be the most loving thing for me to do? Would it be showing  that my care  and compassion for my family are primary?" (Time, place, circumstance, love, and care and very important in consequentialist thinking

3.  Virtue Ethics: Aristotle wrote that the happy life is the life of "virtuous action," that happens to be filled with pleasure to.  He considered honor to be the most important ingredient in the good life In the classical sense, virtue is a developed capacity to accomplish the moral good in spite of obstacles, at a great cost to us or those we love.



Quotes for discussion

Friedrich Nietzsche, whose scientific method was truly "experimental", alerted us to the fact that "morality" - standardized moral judgements of a given society - devalues the individual for the sake of the aggregate of individuals in order to maintain the status quo.  The individual is erased, being subsumed into the herd. 
      ( from MLA Call for Papers [Re]Valuing Value and Values in an Emerging Integral Age
         January 2003 Philip Dalton)

 

You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, German poet, novelist, playwright, scientist and philosopher (1749-1832)



 

 

 

 

 

 

Under construction: