- Moral precepts are reasonable, being grounded in reason
- Moral precepts reflect reflect the culture and promote a culture
- If a supreme being(s) created mankind, it/he should best know
which rules should be followed. God is the best authority, being
all-knowing, knows all facts and laws.
- Divine Command provides us with more freedom as it equips us
with guidelines and tools to self-mastery and fulfillment (Do not
COVET - guiding internal acts)
- The precepts guide our well-being, that we may eventually
be united with God m heaven and experience the beatific
vision. - And if God doesn't exist, as Pascal asks, "What have we
lost?"
- It generally keeps one out of trouble
|
- Can we prove the
existence of God?
- An atheist would not
agree that rules are sent from God. He may, however, think the rules
are good, just, and reasonable and therefore subscribe to them.
- Can we really know God's will when there are so many diverse
explanations of the Bible?
-
Is God's will but an opiate of the believing masses?
Can it be used to subjugate the masses (into castes...)
- Does divine command undermine human autonomy? (Hinman)
- Alfred North Whitehead, Modes of Thought, Page 15, "The
simple minded use of the notions 'right or wrong' is one of the
chief obstacles to the progress of understanding."
- Paul Tillich Systematic Theology Vol 1, p. 151: "The law
of
love is the ultimate law because it is the negation of law; it
is absolute because it concerns everything concrete." Have we
evolved beyond this?
- It is difficult to see the rational foundation and explain some
of the precepts.
|